Inland News
Mojave Cross Replaced, Then Removed
"After determining that it had had none of the scratches and nicks the previous one had, he determined that it was a replica. 'We're still under a court injunction,' Slater said. 'We have to take it down.'... But they haven't yet received any information leading to a suspect, Slater said. She declined to say whether authorities would seek a subpoena for the e-mail."
Mojave Cross Replaced, Then Removed
"After determining that it had had none of the scratches and nicks the previous one had, he determined that it was a replica. 'We're still under a court injunction,' Slater said. 'We have to take it down.'... But they haven't yet received any information leading to a suspect, Slater said. She declined to say whether authorities would seek a subpoena for the e-mail."
So have they subpoenaed the email or not? Being a moderately intelligent person, I suspect that email from the thief would be a vital part of the investigation to ascertain his identity. If they do not hunt this idiot down with the full force of the law, any subsequent ruling from the Supreme Court becomes a joke. Supreme Court said what? So what!
No comments:
Post a Comment